For my project, I think there is more work to be done due to the fact that I picked such a comprehensive topic. There are so many different topics within the natural resources area of work which made it difficult to try to include all of them into my webcase. Realistically, choosing one or two of the topics would’ve been a better idea in order to narrow down my research. Furthermore, doing a wide range of topics has created holes in my research due to the fact that doing research for all four topics under natural sources was more time consuming than I thought. For example, when it comes to the topic on addressing precarity, there are other demographics that should be taken into account, race being one of the major ones. This would demonstrate the intersection of race and socioeconomic status and display the relationship between those two variables. Additionally, I would say I need to work on my ‘Natural Resources’ page because it has a lot of the same content as my homepage. I would also work more on the overall structure of my pages and making the pages and content flow better.

One aspect I believe did well with, however, was the content of my interview. The interview I had with Michele Paul was rich and full of quotes I could pull that related to the content of my webcase project. These quotes helped my shape what different themes and key points I wanted to include in my webcase project.